Hello, On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Petr Stodulka <pstod...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On 4.9.2017 19:27, Michal Novotny wrote: > > I might contact you for more information, but alright, if you feel the > custom script is more convenient, > > then I am all for it. But first, I would like to make a proposal of each > option (with screenshots and > > just complete feature request description) so that users can clearly > see the options and pick what > > they like the best. We can work with Pavel on it. > > > > If you agree, I would post the two proposals here before actual > implementation. > > > > Yes, it would be fine see concrete proposals to discuss it before > implementation. Thanks. > in the end, we decided, we will probably try out both ways. I will likely implement the 'make srpm' command in addition to 'tito', 'tito --test', 'rpkg' options in the SCM tab and Pavel will make new source type called 'Custom' (or something similar) where user can script out the way how sources for a subsequent srpm build are going to be fetched. This script will be stored in DB and will launched in a chroot initialized by a set of predefined buildroot packages (i.e. fedpkg, wget,). Both solutions will be fairly equivalent, except in the first case the script will be stored in a Git repository, whereas in the second, it will be stored in the COPR database. The latter will likely offer more more freedom in where to fetch sources from (i.e. launchpad.net or CPAN) whereas the former will be focused mainly on Git and SVN (likely) sources. Consider this still to be in a proposal state. We will see how well the actual implementation goes. > > P. > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org