On 7 October 2017 at 13:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:19:17AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > Although personally I have no specific objections and indeed plan to use > > the IP accounting stuff on a bunch of units... since we're already past > > beta, this is a critical component of the system and it's not got a > Change > > on the wiki for F27 I'd suggest that you need to raise your case with > FESCo > > for approval of doing this. > > Well, my point is that in this case there aren't any big changes, only > some relatively minor feature additions. According to the policy, > "minor" upgrades are OK after beta. The only difference for critical > path packages is some additional karma requirements. > > The formal side is pretty clear. Instead, I'm giving the heads up in > case any technical issues or regressions crop up. I'm especially > interested in feedback from people who run rawhide, especially if they > use various container technologies, namespaces, and such, which is > probably the area most like to regress. In addition, it's possible that > the fixes that are present in v235 could break some use cases. AFAIK, > we didn't change documented behaviour, but rather clarified various gray > areas, but I'm well aware that upstream developers test systemd only in > narrow fraction of ways it is used in the wild. Hence this thread. > Sorry, I should have made that clearer in my original e-mail. > > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Ah gotcha .. I'm looking forward to DynamicUser ... I'll probably update lldpd and sslh to make use of that later on in the weekend to give it a test.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
