On lundi 9 octobre 2017 17:55:28 CEST Mattia Verga wrote:
> Is anyone having problems with the output of fedora-review?
> 
> I've done two reviews [1] with a lot of false positives:
> 
>   * I get a notice of header files must be in -devel subpackage because
>     fedora-review considers header files in -debugsource subpackage to
>     be wrong
>   * I get a long list of directories owned by other packages
>   * The rpmlint output of installed packages seems to be unable to open
>     URLs (and I also get a "sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory")
> 
> I found no open bugs on pagure for those issues, am I the only one who
> see them?
> 
> Mattia
> 
> [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706199
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879933

No, you're not the only one who gets them, I just ignore them as I've always 
seen fedora-review as an imperfect tool, not always up to date wuth the latest 
giedelines.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to