On 11 October 2017 at 16:23, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Till Hofmann <thofm...@fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> The very first sentence of the page you linked above:
>>
>>> The updates-testing repository, also referred to as Test Updates,
>>> contains updates scheduled to be released for Branched pre-releases (after
>>> the Bodhi enabling point) and stable releases of Fedora
>>>
>>
>> The point is that your update is not intended to ever make it to the
>> stable update, i.e., it is not "scheduled to be released" for anything. If
>> I understood correctly, you want people to test the beta version and then
>> eventually submit the final release (i.e., not this update) to stable. I
>> don't think that's how the updates-testing repository is supposed to be
>> used. Instead, it should only contain updates that will eventually make it
>> into stable.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Till
>>
>
> +1 - Exactly...
>
>
>
>
Thought I'd quickly test this being built in a COPR ... but where exactly
are you building from?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/blob/f27/f/firefox.spec

That shows vesion 56, not 57, and same with rawhide.

I didn't think we could build from a non-fedora-branch git branch for a
bodhi update ... that feels ... wrong ...

Is this an intended effect of the "arbitrary branches" for modularity?

This really feels like it breaks the history/audit trail fro what ends up
in our repos.

This doesn't even show the branch it came from:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=981886

Surely stuff that is non-scratch in koji and intended for a Fedora compose
should come from a release branch - at least outside of modularity stuff?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to