On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:25:22PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other > distros have differing opinions. Personally I think it is dubious even for > OpenSSL, and if you start broadening it further to claim it applies to what > are effectively application level libiraries like libcups, where does it end ? > You could just claim it applies to any widely used library in Fedora, at which > point you're effectively just trying to nullify all licensing rules, whichs is > not acceptable IMHO.
I've bumped this over to the legal mailing list [1]. We'll see what their far more knowledgable heads have to say. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TYGLR34XR6L6MAXMVSDNYT3ZYXUKY7FX/ - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org Coconut Creek, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
