On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> wrote:
> On 06/04/2018 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> On 06/04/2018 10:50 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
>
>> It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP
>> supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries are
>> for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and nothing more.
>
>
> I do not agree with this sentiment all, as well as I can't deny finding your
> wording bewildering, because I think you actually are trying to say:
>
> - You (Florian) want to abandon the i686 architecture.
> - You (RH) want to play down the fact Fedora 28 is FUBARed on the PIII and
> instead of fixing the issues you want to kill it.
>
I don't think RH is trying to hide anything here. The i686 SIG was
created specifically to handle issues like this. What are they doing
to fix it?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5JTHNVTE6J5KV6DRGQ7J2NSZHRUOEGZ5/
