On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth <m...@cchtml.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: > >> Thanks for the data. 25k is still a pretty healthy number. :) I realize >> that there are a lot of unknowns in the data, so it is difficult to draw >> any hard conclusions, but 25k is still much larger than 0. Splitting into >> i686 into i586 and i686 would give more insight into who still needs >> non-SSE2... Probably hurts my argument, though. :) >> >> > Jeff, > > If you want to do the work involved to split up the 32-bit arches please > do it. > > The discussion going on here is not a democratic vote on if non-x86_64 > CPUs are supported. :) > > Fair point. :) -- Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com http://github.com/jsbackus
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WNMZXU23ME5KYXO4B77HLKSLUJUEBIBL/
