On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:41:01PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/05/2018 02:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >So if we made this change, it should
> >probably go through the System-Wide Change process, the same as
> >any other item we remove from the default buildroot.
> 
> I agree that it is a useful change, but also that it should go
> through the Change process.
OK.

> On 07/05/2018 02:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >My concern there would be that any package that needs langpacks
> >available in its build-system will now need to request them
> >specifically (for example, if the package does tests of
> >localization in %check). 
I wonder how many such packages there are. I have seen many packages
which fail in an non-unicode locale, especially in tests. glibc-minimal-langpack
contains C.UTF-8 so that is should not be an issue. So far I haven't
seen packages that would depend on the presence of some specific
locales, except that many packages need *some* utf-8 locale so they
set some specific one, usually en_US.utf8. A quick grep shows that
there's maybe a 50 such packages that would need to be adjusted.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q7D7A3UEAUMLHEZIG4EXHJDHPWKZXRS3/

Reply via email to