Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> […]
>
>> For example, the rpmlint's .gitignore contains the
>> following¹:
>
>> /*.rpm
>> /results_rpmlint/
>> /rpmlint-*/
>> /rpmlint-*.tar.gz
>
>> […]
>
> Apropos: Many .gitignores only reference the source files,
> i. e. not /results_${name} or /${name}-*.rpm. Therefore I
> usually add the latter two to .git/info/exclude and I wonder
> how others handle this.
If it's a package I often work on, I generally add it to the
.gitignore directly.
> Will fedpkg (and its backend) always create results_${name}
> and ${name}-*.rpm in the top directory or is the destination
> configurable? If the former, it would make sense to add
> them to .gitignore "for everybody", e. g. recommend that in
> the Packaging Guidelines. If not, I'd find it useful to
> have "fedpkg clone" add them to the initial
> .git/info/exclude.
The results_* and *.src.rpm files are always created at the
top level and are not configurable in fedpkg/rpkg (so far as
I can tell).
I think it makes sense to have them in every package
.gitignore file. Whether that's best done via the scripts
which are used to create a new repo after a package review,
via fedpkg/rpkg (automatically or by a command/option), or
just documented as a best practice in the guidelines I'm not
sure.
--
Todd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted
to do that, I'd vote.
-- Duckman
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZAT7KK5GBEONTPI4VVGSDCFDFLHP6IJG/
