On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote:
> > On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> Available Packages
> >> kernel.src        4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> >> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> >
> >
> > This is what I get:
> >
> > # dnf list --all kernel
> > Installed Packages
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.16.11-300.fc28
> > @updates
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.4-200.fc28
> > @updates-testing
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> > @updates
> > Available Packages
> > kernel.src                            4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> > pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> > pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> >
> > That last one is highlighted in blue.  The problem is that it seems to
> only
> > show packages that would be an upgrade, even though "--all" should
> override
> > that.  Try adding "--showduplicates", that gives me:
> >
> > # dnf list --all --showduplicates kernel
> > Installed Packages
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.16.11-300.fc28
> > @updates
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.4-200.fc28
> > @updates-testing
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> > @updates
> > Available Packages
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.16.3-301.fc28
> fedora
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.16.11-300.fc28
> > @updates
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.4-200.fc28
> > @updates-testing
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> > @updates
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> updates
> > kernel.src                            4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> > pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> > kernel.x86_64                         4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> > pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> >
> > Now it shows me the old one from the initial fedora release repo as well.
>
>
> [chris@f28h ~]$ sudo dnf list --all --showduplicates kernel
> [sudo] password for chris:
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:39:32 ago on Tue 24 Jul 2018 11:21:48 AM
> MDT.
> Installed Packages
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.3-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.4-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.6-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.7-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc29      @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc5.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
> Available Packages
> kernel.x86_64     4.16.3-301.fc28               fedora
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.3-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.4-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.6-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.7-200.fc28               @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.17.7-200.fc28               updates
> kernel.src        4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc29      @@commandline
> kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc5.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
> [chris@f28h ~]$ sudo dnf install kernel-4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28.x86_64
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:42:59 ago on Tue 24 Jul 2018 11:21:48 AM
> MDT.
> Dependencies resolved.
> ============================================================
> ========================================
>  Package
>         Arch   Version                   Repository
>                         Size
> ============================================================
> ========================================
> Installing:
>  kernel x86_64 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora  48 k
> Installing dependencies:
>  kernel-core
>         x86_64 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora  26 M
>  kernel-modules
>         x86_64 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora  29 M
>
> Transaction Summary
> ============================================================
> ========================================
> Install  3 Packages
>
> Total download size: 54 M
> Installed size: 91 M
> Is this ok [y/N]:
>
>
> OK so it has to be explicitly named. I'm not sure what happens if
> there ends up being a name conflict with two enabled repos though, I
> guess I'd have to disablerepo for updates and u-t to force it to use
> the one in the copr.
>
>
> --
> Chris Murphy
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.
> fedoraproject.org/message/SZGW72AQ4RR4Q4RIOHECUVJET63YVEM7/



I will rebuild it to fix this,also whoever that was concerned with the
swapping process issue i am working on it,also a issue has been created
upstream,the person who did it for arch reported similar issues too.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J55PLENW6KVTROXUORARARP7E47D2LI7/

Reply via email to