On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > Would it be necessary for us to pick one or the other here? IOW,
> > whether the maintainer picked a specific date or a release, the EOL
> > would resolve to a date. If they pick none, or explicitly choose
> > 'rawhide,' then the artifact is essentially on a rolling window.
> Yeah... that's a good point. Maybe having the ability to specify EOL as a
> specific Fedora release or a date could be a good way forward. I like that.


I don't think we should use "rawhide" to mean "rolling updates", because it
also has the implication of "project devel stream".

I know this was talked about a long time ago, but I'm not sure how it came
down in practice: what's the tooling and workflow for moving users to a new
stream when a stream reaches EOL?

For example, Rawtherapee, which has a fairly traditional major/minor
versioning scheme. Upstream provides downloads for old versions, but doesn't
really support them. And, explicitly they say everyone should be on the
latest stable release -- they didn't support a 4.x branch when 5.0 came out.

From a user point of view, the three streams I might
want to choose from are:

* Rolling always latest
* Nightly dev builds!
* A conservative stream which updates annually (or less!), ideally with
  backports for critical security bugs

I know there was pushback against naming stream branches "stable", so is
there a good _other_ way to offer this? If I name the stream branch "5"
after the upstream major release, how do I get people in the first case
seamlessly on to "6" when it comes out, whenever that is?


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to