Hi, On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 09:52, Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > qpdf got new version and I would like to rebase our rawhide version, but > two packages will need to be rebuilt, because they depends on libqpdf > library. > I'm confused; there does not appear to be a soname bump: $ rpm -q --provides qpdf-libs libqpdf.so.21()(64bit) libqpdf.so.21(LIBQPDF_21)(64bit) qpdf-libs = 8.1.0-3.fc29 qpdf-libs(x86-64) = 8.1.0-3.fc29 vs $ rpm -q --provides -p ./qpdf-libs-8.2.1-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm libqpdf.so.21()(64bit) libqpdf.so.21(LIBQPDF_21)(64bit) qpdf-libs = 8.2.1-1.fc30 qpdf-libs(x86-64) = 8.2.1-1.fc30 > - python-pikepdf > > - cups-filters > > I can manage cups-filters rebuild, but I would like to ask > python-pikepdf's maintainer to rebuild his package. > > Rebuild is done. > I have copr project > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zdohnal/qpdf/builds/ , where I > tried to rebuild cups-filters and python-pikepdf with new qpdf. > python-pikepdf's new version fails to build even with old qpdf (I > reported it to python-pikepdf's maintainer at bugzilla > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631890). > > Because python-pikepdf is broken anyway, I'll rebuild cups-filters and > put new qpdf with rawhide. > > -- > Zdenek Dohnal > Associate Software Engineer > Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C > > > -- Elliott
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
