Hi folks,

I have found this error even during netpbm build [1].
Do we have any progress with it? I couldn't found anything related to dwz crash 
in build log. (Maybe I just overlooked it).

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6251/31036251/build.log

Regards 

Josef Ridky
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com>
| To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 10:07:08 AM
| Subject: Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: 
.s390x.debug.#dwz#
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Dne 27.7.2018 v 00:31 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
| 
| 
| 
| On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
| Mark Wielaard <m...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| Hello.
| 
| I try build new version of perdition package.
| 
| It build fine
| ( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416 )
| on
| all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
| ( https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b uild.log):
| 
| error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
| 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
| 
| Could someone please help me solve that problem?
| It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
| Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
| crashed.
| But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
| find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
| files.
| I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
| the
| end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
| that hints at where it is coming from.
| 
| It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
| to track down what is going on.
| so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
| 
| Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
| Sorry, is there any progress?
| Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
| for some reason. See attached.
| 
| Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
| to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
| replicate the issue.
| 
| Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:
| 
| ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
| ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
| 'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
|   if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
|                                    ^~
| ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
| ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
| 'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
|    if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
|                                           ^~
| make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1
| 
| Please note that OpenSSL 1.1.1 landed in Rawhide a few days ago. That could
| explain this errors ...
| 
| V.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?
| It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
| I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
| _find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
| because of the above error.
| 
| Cheers,
| 
| Mark
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an
| email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
| https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:
| https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:
| 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KORDFM5B3FXCY3RJ2MYBH5MT4YBNPJBJ/
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
| To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
| List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
| List Archives:
| 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MHONT5U3VWPVA324CKYBNE5TCB2RVZ43/
| 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to