_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
gnupg2 is now obsoleting gnupg and the previous gpg command is not available.
The change page said gpg would be renamed gpg1, but this was not done.
Unfortunately gpg2 will not read my existing secret keys. (They are pretty
old and probably should be replaced.) For now using rpm --nodeps allowed
me to replaced the gnupg2 version of gpg with the gnupg version so I could
get at some encrypted data, but it would be nice if the plan from the change
page had been used instead of what was done. If the plan has changed, then
updating the change page to match what was done would be nice. Though in
the latter case there should be a warning about breaking things for some
people.
- Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed to gpg1? Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed ... Igor Gnatenko
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be rena... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be ... Rex Dieter
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed ... John Harris
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be rena... Panu Matilainen
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be ... Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to... Rex Dieter
- Re: Wasn't gpg suppos... Christopher
- Re: Wasn't gpg su... Rex Dieter
- Re: Wasn't gp... Christopher