Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> said:
> To me, this includes shipping a great new 
> technology such as LZMA SquashFS, without waiting for the upstream kernel. 

You've insisted over and over (and over) again that the KDE SIG should
have absolute authority over the KDE packages, and that even FESCo
shouldn't be able to set an update policy for KDE packages.

Why don't you give the kernel maintainers the same courtesy?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to