On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:39 AM Mamoru TASAKA <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/02/27 2:29: > > Richard Shaw wrote on 2019/02/27 2:23: > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:17 AM Mamoru TASAKA < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> So... I guess Qt "foreach" behavior changed with gcc9.. > >>> > >> > >> Is there any chance this will change or magically get fixed if qt is > >> rebuilt with gcc 9? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Richard > >> > > > > Well, foreach or Q_FOREACH is just a "#define" macro (from > /usr/include/Qt/qglobal.h and > > /usr/include/QtCore/qglobal.h), so rebuilding qt(4) itself does not > sense. > > > > So now I tried to change all "foreach(... , ...)" usage with "for(... : > ...)", > actually it seems okay?? > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33067948 > > What I did is: > > LANG=C grep -rl 'foreach.*,' . | \ > xargs sed -i -e '\@foreach.*,@s|foreach\(.*\),|for\1:|' > > So now I appreciate it if someone would investigate Q_FOREACH macro. > Thanks Mamoru! As far as you know is this safe to put in an official build? Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
