On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:32 AM Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 2019-03-27 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Nicolas Mailhot > > <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > > >> POSIX is dead as a shell compatibility target. You want to replace > >> bash > >> with something faster, by all means do it. With something that > >> includes > >> the GNU extensions like pushd/popd that most packagers expect today. > > > > Is there any reason to *ever* use pushd or popd in %build or %install > > today? > > That is totally the wrong attitude when you want to replace an > implementation used for years by thousands of volunteer people in tens > of thousands of interdependent files.
*I* wasn't suggesting altering the files. I'm merely startled by the use of "pushd" and "popd" in build tools, especially within %build or %install. > It is used now, ergo packagers (the people who did the work) find it > useful and convenient. You want them to do something else, you need to > make it worth their effort to something else. Winning 10 minutes of CPU > time in a single pathological spec like gcc isn't it. Looking at https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gcc.git/tree/gcc.spec ..... *ouch*. Yeah, that is a good example. I disagree with that part of the .spec file's logic, but wouldn't want to take on testing and debugging something that takes this long to compile. > Yet another is to propose a syntax with is clearly simpler, more > expressive, more productive and better documented for humans (Not CPUs. > CPUs do not get to vote). But, that solves "new spec and macro code" > problem, not the "existing code" problem. > > Hazing people with negative terms like bashism never convinced anyone. > Especially when others are doing the work, not you. In my language, that > is called “arriving after the battle”: complaining loudly at the people > who sweated and blooded doing some work, that they didn't do it well > enough, when you were safely somewhere else, at the time help was > needed. That wasn't me. I was just asking about whether using pushd and popd in a .spec file made sense. I think it does not, it's safer to specify the target directory explicitly rather than rely on these tools. But that's a matter of policy and best practices. > Sincerely, > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
