On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:04:53PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > because rpm automatically adds something like:
> >
> > libfoo.so.1()(64bit)
> >
> > Of course, I could still add a superfluous
> >
> > Requires: libfoo
> This could pull in the 32 bit version of the package so it's wrong as
> well as redundant. (You'd want to use %{_isa} I think)
> Is there a reason why you want to add extra Requires lines?
I don't want to add extra Requires lines.
On the contrary, I want to remove an extra Requires line but was
challenged by the maintainer to keep it (without providing a convincing
reason, I would say):
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maildrop/pull-request/1
Thus, to finally resolve this issue I googled for the Fedora policy,
without finding the relevant section - thus I asked on this list.
Best regards
Georg
--
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you think it will
take, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
