On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 13:54, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> At this moment, > > * %meson doesn't pass -Db_ndebug at all, we use project-specific options > * If project doesn't specify it, b_ndebug=false is default in meson > * In case of mesa, it specifies b_ndebug=if-release which works correctly > now with backported patch > IMO discussed here issue is more related to Fedora macros. As current definition of the %meson uses --buildtype=plain instead --buildtype=release and that build type is fixed and does not provide any other way to redefine build type than just just pass another --buildtype=<other_build_type> fiddling anything around plain build profile straight in meson source code may introduce more harm than good thing. IMO whole rpm macro suite should proved something like %build_type macro which should be used transparently by %configure, %cmake and %meson. Effectively for now Fedora IMO needs only as %build_type something like "release" and "debug". Any other type of the build should have some strict definition of the propose. IMO it would be even good to have in whole rawhide development cycle something like build all packages with build type "debug" and use "release" type only after branching all packages and rebuild everything with build type "release". This would as well guarantee that whatever will be offered in new stable release will be building with all other packages (which up to now still is not the case). kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
