On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 10:54:42 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 12:48:15PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > 'BionetGen' currently is built against 'Sundials-3'; however, > > 'BionetGen' development is slower than 'Sundials'; BioNetGen still > > provides bundle old 'cvode-2.6.0' (from older sundials releases [1]) > > code and anyway it's not totally compatible with 'Sundials 3'. > > > > Because of these reasons i built BionetGen using the bundled cvode-2.6.0 > > code so as to free Sundials updates. [2] > > > > <snip> > > > > Any disagreement? > > Hi, > > no disagreement. This sounds like the most reasonable solution. > Thanks for the update ;)
+1. It seems to be required in a lot of scientific software. I do make it a point to file a ticket with upstream and comment in the spec, and of course, I include the "Provides bundled (<libname>)" line as the guidelines indicate. Eg: https://github.com/vxl/vxl/issues/627 Guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
