On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 15:28, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 20:06 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 6/3/19 7:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Some people don't see any problem with this, personally it drives me > > > crazy and I wish it were policy that *every* retired package must be > > > obsoleted. But it isn't. > > I am quite shocked to hear this from you. I wouldn't have expected this > > attitude from you. > > > > You seem have forgotten about the problems, such obsoletes cause, e.g. > > when packages are being reintroduced or move to 3rd party repos or when > > 3rd party packages depend upon them. > > Version the obsoletes correctly and this doesn't need to be a problem > at all. > Write code correctly and we wouldn't need to ever do updates either :) That never seems to happen so how do you deal with it when it doesn't.. tell the user they should have had better backups? > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
