On 30. 07. 19 21:53, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I don't see an answer to Jan's question about "javaewah" and think it
might have gotten buried in the thread, so I'd like to say -- I have
this question too. It seems something went wrong with the script that
generated the list.
Sorry, I've accidentally replied to Jan off-list, the reply was:
One must follow the dependency chain.
javaewah -> jgit -> git -> 380 pkgs
The dependency between jgit and git can be broken, as it was on 32bit
architectures already. See my other reply to this thread.
--- end of the reply ---
Note that it is natural that if you need git, you don't care about jgit at all,
however the reason your package is affected is the following:
1) if jgit gets retired, git fails to build
2) if git fails to build, it will be retired
3) without git, your package fails to build
Of course, dependencies can be removed (like in this case), however that is
currently impossible to check automatically.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
