Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> The proposal[1] as it stands is to drop all aspects of 32-bit support,
> i.e. client, server, gfapi, etc., going forward from glusterfs-8. This
> should be considered advanced notice that consumers that have dependencies
> need to plan accordingly.
>
> Please feel free though to add your thoughts to the issue.
>
> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/702
The upstream issue actually says they want to keep building 32-bit in their
CI, so it should compile just fine, they just won't test it. So an
ExcludeArch should not be necessary.
It is quite likely that many upstream projects are never tested on armv7hl
by upstream. That doesn't mean we need to ExcludeArch: armv7hl all of them.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
