I agree that subpackages for py2 and py3 seems best, but I'll have to see if mercurial can be parallel installed without too much effort. I don't expect to have time to work on this for the next 2 weeks.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:16 PM Mads Kiilerich <m...@kiilerich.com> wrote: > > You are giving many good reasons why we need Mercurial packages for > Python 2 and Python 3, side by side. > > That will make it possible for other packages to jump to Python 3. Your > package will no longer be blocking, and it doesn't have to be your concern. > > It will also put the Mercurial package in the good position where it has > done all the work of transitioning, and the python2 part will be > entirely optional, only kept alive for benefit of other packages that > still depend on it. > > I am working upstream with tortoisehg. While late, I don't expect any > problems. The current blocker for Fedora packaging of tortoisehg is the > lack of Python 3 Mercurial, and the biggest risk is that the Python 2 > Mercurial package goes away before I had time to transition the > tortoisehg package to depend on Python 3 Mercurial. > > /Mads > > > > On 8/16/19 3:53 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > > I think tortoisehg is not ported to python3 > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:39 PM Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just tested hg-5.1.0 with the latest git version of hg-evolve on > >> python3 and at least some basic things seem to be working. One > >> problem: > >> hg > >> *** failed to import extension hggit: No module named 'compat' > >> > >> That's with the latest pip version of hg-git (0.8.12). > >> > >> hg-git is a supported fedora package, so I think we need this to work. > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:35 AM Petr Stodulka <pstod...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 12. 08. 19 22:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>>> On 12. 08. 19 20:37, Petr Stodulka wrote: > >>>>> Can you explain better what do you mean by that? I am little lost > >>>>> here. > >>>> Sure. The idea was: > >>>> > >>>> 1) When Fedora 31 is branched (scheduled for tomorrow [1]), push the > >>>> switch to rawhide (Fedora 32) > >>>> > >>>> 2) See what happens, collect feedback. > >>>> > >>>> 3) Soon before F31 Beta Freeze (scheduled for 2019-08-29 [1]) decide > >>>> whether this is worth pushing to F31 (probably not) > >>>> > >>>> 4) Soon before F32 mass Python 2 removal flag day (scheduled for mid > >>>> November [2]), decide whether to revert and request and exception or not > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule > >>>> [2] > >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython2#Detailed_Description > >>>> > >>> Thanks Miro for explanation. That sounds asi the best idea now probably. > >>> From that point, I will not create new subpackages for Py2 / Py3 and I > >>> will just do the switch tomorrow. > >>> > >>> @mercurial-maintainers: if anyone have something against or better > >>> solution, answer here guys, otherwise I will do the rebase. > >>> Just FYI, I will be kinda offline between 2019-08-15 - 2019-08-25 because > >>> of PTO. So in case of troubles, I will not be able to do anything during > >>> that time. From that point, I could postpone the rebase if needed, but I > >>> hope that someone else will be able to help around instead of me in case > >>> of troubles. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Petr Stodulka > >>> OS & Application Modernization > >>> IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak > >>> Software Engineer > >>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it > > > > > -- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
