On 9/10/19 11:50 PM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:54 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: >> Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose?
I would think so yes. There's a lot of things there that you would want to point elsehwere if you are remixing. kevin -- > > Hi Danishka Navin, > Good question on a bad place. Adding Fedora devel list here, there > could be someone who is able to answer you this question. > Jirka >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:11 PM Vendula Poncova <vponc...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin <danis...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova < >>>> vponc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin < >>>>> danis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jirka, >>>>>> >>>>>> I used the following command but did't use --product and -- >>>>>> version at all. >>>>>> Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we >>>>>> ignore both --product and --version? >>>>>> >>>>>> livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live- >>>>>> workstation.ks --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with >>>>>> my custom configs. >>>>>> I could not reproduce the issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the >>>>>> /etc/os-release file. >>>>>> >>>>>> REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora" >>>>>> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw, there is a new issue occurred. >>>>>> As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of >>>>>> redhat-release file. >>>>>> I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release >>>>>> file. >>>>>> https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit. >>>>>> When using "Hanthana 30" >>>>>> >>>>>> https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from >>> /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in >>> network installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file >>> below. I think that all these problems are related. >>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM <jkone...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> You have probably used bad parameters when you were >>>>>>> invoking lorax. You have to use correct --product and -- >>>>>>> version parameters otherwise we will be handling your ISO >>>>>>> as Rawhide. >>>>>>> Could you please tell us what command did you used to >>>>>>> create your ISO? >>>>>>> Regards,Jirka >>>>>>> On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO, >>>>>>>> "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand >>>>>>>> side of anaconda GUI. >>>>>>>> May I know what could cause this? >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the >>>>> flag for a final release: >>>>> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L93 >>>>> >>>>> Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that >>>>> provides system-release, so I would check that. >>>>> >>>>> What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your >>>>> ISO? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> rpm -q --whatprovides system-release >>>>> rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release >>>> >>>> $ rpm -q --whatprovides system-release >>>> fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch >>>> $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release >>>> 900[ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the >>> environment variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is >>> started. >>> Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp >>> file to determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't >>> have this file and should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to >>> the .buildstamp file can be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp >>> or set by the environment variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check >>> that these files do not exist on your ISO? >>> Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and attach the Anaconda logs from the >>> installation. >>> >>>> >>>>> Vendy >>>>> >>>>>>>> both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see >>>>>>>> given values. >>>>>>>> both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO >>>>>>>> build along with few 3rd party repos. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Danishka Navin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________Anaconda- >>>>>>>> devel-list mailing listanaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Danishka Navin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >>>>>> >>>>>> anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >>>>> >>>>> anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >>>>> >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Danishka Navin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >>>> >>>> anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >>>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >>> >>> anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >>> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >> >> >> _______________________________________________Anaconda-devel-list >> mailing listanaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
