On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:08:13AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > The "compelling use case" is that it doesn't make sense to maintain 2 > > pieces > > of core infrastructure code doing the same thing, especially when one's > > functionality is a subset of the other's. (Now the problem is that it still > Maybe. The tradeoff is that it's asking me to run another relatively > complicated daemon on all of my systems, running all of the time, simply for > the sake of configuring something statically at boot time. And maintaining > the legacy system is pretty straightforward. This crosses over into the MTA > thread: clearly, a huge advantage for the laptop case, and some reasonable > arguments for desktop use -- but unless Fedora as a whole is ready to bite > the bullet and declare itself officially no good for servers, some > consideration should be made.
PS: I want to add that I'm encouraged by the thought and work that's going into tools like nmcli. And man pages. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@mattdm.org> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
