On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:21:44 PM EDT Tom Hughes wrote: > On 17/10/2019 20:44, Steve Grubb wrote: > > I don't think __x86_64__ is defined as the program is aimed at eBPF in > > the > > kernel. In rawhide, we no longer have glibc-devel(x86-32) to allow this > > to > > resolve. However, I think that the assumption of not having __x86_64__ > > defined means we are targeting i686 is wrong. What should I do? Do we not > > support eBPF programs on Fedora? > > I can still see glibc-devel.i686 in rawhide which provides that.
In rawhide I got [1]: No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)' But on my local system, F30, it works fine. > As far as I know the 32 bit multilib packages aren't going away. Hmm. I still wonder if the headers might need reworking to not assume 32 bit if the target is bpf. -Steve [1] - https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2047/38352047/ mock_output.log _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
