On 15. 11. 19 2:18, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Modular packages without defaults makes sense if they have
dependencies on a non-default stream. For example: ReviewBoard depends
on the Django:1.6 stream because of complicated upstream reasons. I
have to choose between "modular without a default stream" or "not
available on Fedora", because we have agreed on a prohibition on
default streams with dependencies on non-default streams.
The right fix would be to package Django 1.6 as a parallel-installable
compatibility package instead. I don't see why I cannot install ReviewBoard
together with another Django web app on the same web server (without
containers/VMs). (Admittedly a hypothetical example because I am running
neither ReviewBoard nor another Django app on a server I maintain. I also do
not run Fedora on a server. But if I were faced with this issue as a server
administrator, I would curse loudly at Fedora and switch the server to a
distribution that does not get in my way that way.)
And I would use pip or pipenv to do this. Obviously, people have different
workflows and different opinions. However, since neither me or you use
ReviewBoard, but it also stays out of our way, why don't we focus on the problem
at hand and leave non-default modular streams exist?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
