On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:31 AM Germano Massullo
<germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello, in comment
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767576#c7
> I wrote my experience about fedora-review / mock bug that returns message
> %{python3_pkgversion} expanded too early.
>
> As workaround I renamed
> python3-dateutil-2.8.0-2.fc30.src.rpm
> to
> pythonX-dateutil-2.8.0-2.fc30.src.rpm
> but fedora-review fails and mock instead works. How can this happen?
Slow up. I have been publishing patches for mock, doing some build
requests but partly due to pull rejections maintaining a "build mock
for me!!!" repo at:
https://github.com/nakdel/mockrepo/
It's been working pretty well for me building packages on CentOS 6/7/8
and RHEL 8, and Fedora 31. You're welcome to any useful bits. It
includes work-arounds for the poor version of dnf on RHEL 7 and the
resulting dnf workarounds, and te zstd fix to build Fedora 31 packages
on RHEL or CentOS operating systems. One of the critical fixes I've
been doing is to include "BuildRequires: epel-rpm-macros" on anything
that might build on a CentOS or RHEL OS.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
