On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 6:22 PM John Reiser <jrei...@bitwagon.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/3/20 22:35 UTC, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:25 PM Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Jan 2020 22:45:52 +0100, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> Can someone please explain why gdb dlopen()'s librpm instead of just
> >>> doing proper compile-time linking?
>
>    [[snip]]
>
> >> gdb.spec could auto-detect the current librpm version.
>
> > I think it'd be nice if it auto-detected this stuff. It's weird having
> > to go and fix that manually.
>
> Please do not predict the environment at run time by detecting the environment
> at compile time.  That is generally safe only for the simplest properties
> such as base-level hardware architecture.  Detecting the version of some other
> package is particularly problematic if the ultimate result is to be 
> distributed
> beyond the datacenter where it was built.  Even when the result works,
> it facilitates "version creep" of dependencies: requiring version N+1
> (because because a Fedora builder tends to have newest versions) when
> version N would suffice.

I'm not sure where you got the idea that GDB was somehow special, but
it's not. GDB is *inside* the buildroot, and the version of the
package being used is *always* inside the chroot. So the compile-time
detection *would* always equal what it is used with at runtime.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to