On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +0000 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Hi, > > for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed > failure [1], and one of the failing tests was > fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis. > > When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2], which is a long > list of stuff like "print message" and "shell script" and "ci > notifier". They are all green, and after clicking on one of them to > unroll it, the display jumps, so it took me a while to figure out > that the interesting item is one of the "shell scripts". Dunno, when > doing this a second time I wouldn't be confused so much, but a > slightly less elaborate UI which makes the failing test result more > prominent would be nice. > > [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b49f1d9b82 > [2] > http://fedora-build-checks.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/fedora-rpminspect/detail/fedora-rpminspect/3219/pipeline/ > > Anyhoo, getting to the failing test: > there's a long list of two repeated items: > > [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] rpminspect output for humans - see > rpminspect.json for full details [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] Overall > Result: NOT PASSED [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] NOT PASSED items: > > [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] header-metadata: > [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] message: Package Build Host "unused" > is not within an expected build host subdomain in > systemd-tests-debuginfo-245-1.fc33.s390x > [2020-03-06T13:45:51.450Z] remedy: Make sure the SRPM is built on > a host within the expected subdomain. > > Seems fully bogus? "unused" might be a placeholder value, but even > if it wasn't, we have a dedicated server farm to build things. > As a packager, I don't have any control over the hostname of the > builder and I shouldn't ever need to care. > > [2020-03-06T13:45:51.451Z] elf-object-properties: > [2020-03-06T13:45:51.451Z] > message: /usr/lib/systemd/tests/test-dhcp-client may use functions > unsuitable for IPv6 support on s390x [2020-03-06T13:45:51.451Z] > remedy: Please review all usages of IPv4-only functions and ensure > IPv6 compliance. > > I understand the sentiment, but what is "functions unsuitable for IPv6 > support on s390x"? I'm not a s390x expert, and the code is using > general linux apis. Is this message talking about some s390x-specific > bug? How am I supposed to figure this out, without any function name > or hint what to look for specifically? (Obviously, in the case of a > test binary for DHCPv4, it might be fully legitimately using > IPv4-only constructs…). FWIW the message is repeat for all arches, so nothing s390x specific here Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
