On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 13:20, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:02 AM Leigh Griffin <lgrif...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> I was really looking forward to reading what > >> Neal (as he's doing now) and others had to say about the requirements > >> *before* any decision was taken, and how each tool covers them or not, > >> and what kind of effort would require to cover it in the latter case. > >> This is *very* disappointing. > > > > I'm sorry this is disappointing but even reading the analysis by Neal it is > > looking at the merit of the requirement and not looking at the fact that it > > is valuable to somebody. Each stakeholder group had their own means to > > discuss and debate the merits and had them rolled into CPE who in turn > > analysed them and published the full story list. > > I'm not bothering with the other aspects because there's no point. You > *already* decided. Why should I evaluate the merits of the > requirements when you've already decided they mattered enough to use > them for deciding for GitLab?
I think he's arguing the opposite: that you shouldn't be evaluating the merits of the requirements published just because they are valuable to *someone*, which is crazy. Iñaki _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
