On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Wouldn't be easier to use something we already have? E.g. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages
Obsoletes in individual rpms have no effect on modules, and any enabled module "shadows" non-modular rpms that the module declared, i.e. makes dnf consider only rpms from the module, completely ignoring rpms from the normal repo, no matter what EVRA they have. If that sounds wrong to you, you are not alone. But things are as they are, and this Change is about making upgrades work within the design of Modularity, hopefully avoiding stuff like [1,2,3,4,5]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F31_bugs#Eclipse_module_has_been_reset_to_avoid_shadowing_non-modular_rpms [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780827 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807832 [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806303 Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
