On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 08:33 -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Panu Matilainen" <pmati...@redhat.com> > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 6:22:39 AM > > Subject: Re: CPE Git Forge Decision > > > > > I also appreciate that as a community developing our own solutions is > > > something important and something that seems to matter a lot, but we > > > have to realize that the development and maintenance effort cannot be > > > carried out by the CPE team any more. Maybe this is a opportunity to > > > create a SIG or a working group for people that are interested to carry > > > on this effort. > > > > But this is precisely at the heart of the problem: people feel they were > > not given an opportunity to lend a hand, and that now its too late > > because the messaging is that we go with GitLab, no matter what. > > Pagure has huge developer experience bugs filed against it for many > years. Where have all these contributors been? Are those of us who really > dislike Pagure's workflows in the minority? Or are others more prone > to put up with it because it is free, open source software?
To speak for myself, I've been sending patches to Pagure for some time: https://pagure.io/pagure/commits/master?author=awill...@redhat.com -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
