On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:12 PM Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:53 AM Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > So Field3D had a patch release a while ago and I build the package for
> Rawhide but haven't decided to build for F31+ because I can't tell if the
> abi changes are significant or not and I don't want to rebuild all the
> dependencies.
> >
> > Can someone let me know if this is safe?
>
> Adding functions and variables is okay. The only concern is the 8
> changed variables. If they are not referenced by any consumers of
> Field3D, then updating is okay. I get the impression that those are
> internal variables (because they are static and have a version number
> in their names). If you can confirm that these variables are not
> referenced directly by any Field3D consumers, then go ahead and build
> the update. Otherwise, you will need to rebuild all consumers to be
> sure the update doesn't cause breakage.
>
That doesn't sound like a lot of fun, so seeing as OpenImageIO is the only
consumer on Fedora, perhaps I should just rebuild it anyway to be safe :)
$ sudo dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires "libField3D.so.1.7()(64bit)"
enabling rawhide-modular-source repository
enabling rawhide-source repository
Fedora - Modular Rawhide - Source
125 kB/s | 175 kB 00:01
Fedora - Rawhide - Source
3.2 MB/s | 6.7 MB 00:02
Field3D-0:1.7.3-1.fc33.src
OpenImageIO-0:2.1.13.0-2.fc33.src
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
