On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:30:04AM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:34 AM Michal Schorm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > A long time ago I filled a BZ for F29 against the package group > > @cinnamon-desktop-environment. [1] > > Now I checked, and the issue still exists, so I re-opened it and moved > > against F32. > > > > How can I get someone appropriate to notice it? > > The generic > > "Assignee: Alternative GTK desktop environments" > > seems unresponsive. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684764 > > > I don't know the cause of the issue here, which seems to stem from > something more central than the cinnamon group, but you should not be > installing any environment groups at any time except as a new system. The > environment groups are meant to define the entire installation environment, > to install cinnamon (or another desktop) after having an already installed > desktop environment, use the @cinnamon-desktop group.
Yep. That said, the issue is that some of those things are gone ( lsvpd, isdn4k-utils ) and should be removed from comps, and some of them are only available on arch'es other than the one you are trying to install on ( xorg-x11-drv-omap, powerpc-utils, etc) so they need to indicate in comps what arches they are available on. If someone wants to submit a PR, feel free. I can try to at some point if not. Do note also that this is not fatal to the transaction, it's just some warnings, so I would not put this high on anyones list. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
