On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:47 PM Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote:
> Folks - > > I'm afraid the new FailsToInstall bugs may be a bit much for me. > Often it seems: > > - There is already a FTBFS bug against the package which is the root > cause of the FTI. > - There was a soname bump in rawide and the builds didn't manage to > complete before the next rawhide compose. I know, people probably > should be using side tags, but it's the maintainers of the dependent > packages that are being harassed. And can't we even have a bit more > than a day to address these. > > For released branches, sure go for it (although I would still argue > about checking for a FTBFS bug first). But can we back off a little bit > on rawhide? > Agreed, even on released branches I had some buildroot overrides because I was actively working on update a package. I got a FTBFS bug, so I closed it as invalid. I got a new one filed in a day or two. Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
