Dne 16. 06. 20 v 9:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > 1) It does not reflect, that this is not just about retired packages, > but also (or mainly?) about subpackages, which we don't retire. > > 2) The point (1) is closely related to -debuginfo packages topic [1] > which I re-raised recently with not as much attention as I would like.
Both points are valid and good examples. Noted. Thank you. > Also, I wonder what is wrong with "dnf autoremove", which is supposed to > remove unused leaf packages, which were not explicitly installed? On my system it does not want to remove fwupdate-libs.fc29. Hmm, it seems that it ignores anything else than fc32 (on my F32 machine). -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
