On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:38 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 23. 06. 20 21:11, Ben Rosser wrote: > > Thanks Miro, much appreciated! > > You are welocme. > > However, I am afraid I have some bad news. The recent report in > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt still mentions another 40 > packages: > > tc01: nodejs-optimist, nodejs-burrito, nodejs-cookiejar, nodejs-exit, > nodejs-bunker, nodejs-abbrev, nodejs-which, nodejs-reduce-component, > nodejs-osenv, nodejs-methods, nodejs-resolve, nodejs-charm, nodejs-formidable, > nodejs-temporary, nodejs-mime, nodejs-underscore-dot-string, nodejs-nopt, > nodejs-expect-dot-js, nodejs-superagent, nodejs-findup-sync, > nodejs-runforcover, > nodejs-traverse, nodejs-supertest, nodejs-ejs, nodejs-yamlish, nodejs-through, > nodejs-js-yaml, nodejs-buffer-equal, nodejs-getobject, nodejs-slide, > nodejs-better-assert, nodejs-bindings, nodejs-npmlog, nodejs-defined, > nodejs-package, nodejs-hooker, nodejs-ansi, nodejs-eventemitter2, > nodejs-callsite, nodejs-component-emitter, nodejs-bytes
Hmm... I suppose I might as well also claim these, at least temporarily. Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so those could probably be safely retired. But looking at the orphans report, I'm not confident I correctly separated out the dependency trees, and this is now somewhat time sensitive, so I suppose it's better safe than sorry. (At least this is "only" 80 out of 200 packages...) Ben Rosser [1] https://github.com/magne4000/quassel-webserver/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
