On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:21:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 20:18 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:10:23PM -0000, Artur Iwicki wrote: > > > Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and > > > if doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an > > > enhancement, or a bugfix, or a security update. > > > > I don't think so. I remember my updates sitting in testing for weeks. > > Not that I find it worrisome. If my package is so niche that no one tests > > it, then no one will be impacted if the update is now or month later. > > It hasn't "always" been like this, it was added I think two or three > years back, in response to one of the periodic long arguments about > whether the rules and defaults are too strict or not strict enough.
Thanks for all the explanations, it's clear to me now. For the record, this feature was added a year ago: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2048 https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/3090 -- Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->| to...@pipebreaker.pl 72->| 80->| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
