Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change to Java 11 as a default?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:02 PM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com <mailto: > jva...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > > > Current stats from my testing samples: > > > 408 failing > > > 263 passing > > > > > > > > > Are these numbers reversed ^^^ ? Looking at > > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/java-maint-sig/java-11-default/monitor/ > I see a bit more > > > than 200 ftbfs. > > > > I'm afraid not. But if you are right, then maybe I'm doing something > wrong, and it is all a bit more > > positive then I think. > > > > Thanx! > > I don't know if I've set up the Java SIG COPR for Java 11 rebuilds > differently than you set up yours. Maybe you haven't incorporated the > xmvn-javadoc change yet? It could explain the ~200 additional build > failures. > > Looking at the latest state in our COPR test repo, I see 202 failing > packages and 461 building packages, which isn't looking too bad > considering how the numbers looked at the start. > > > Since f29, about 1000 java packages died or were orphaned. I was > removing packages where upstream is > > dead and are orphaned (so no chance to make them reliable working > with jdk11), and I found that > > wildfly, jenkins, jboss, half of maven plugins, elastic search, > apach-emina, infinispan, cassandra, > > hibernate.... All are dead. What is javastack for now (no blame or > evil in that)? > > > > So maybe the system jdk11 can be used as just last death-blow to > java stack, rethink it, and stat > > rebuilding on pretty fresh field.... > > Why? If nobody needs those packages and nobody wants to maintain them, > then they should stay dead. > > Right now, the core Java stack (including everything that's necessary > to build itself) amounts to about 200 packages, which is already a lot > of packages for limited manpower (Stewardship SIG / Java SIG). Unless > somebody wants to step up (or Red Hat actually wants its Java projects > packaged for fedora again), this is not going to change, I'm afraid. > > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse Team
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
