On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 07:36 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:24:59 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote: > > DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular" action on > > a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on the > > system. However I worry that DNF does not possess a capability for doing > > it. (Except of injecting that command into some externally executed > > script.) > > Unless I'm mistaken, it should only be present if the user manually installed > it, and opted into modularity, right?
The slightly missing context is that the package is new and did not exist until a couple of days ago. Previously modular repos were part of fedora-repos , they have now been split into a separate subpackage which is not be installed by default on fresh installs, effectively meaning the whole modularity system is now optional and not available by default, only if the user runs 'dnf install fedora-repos-modular'. What we're dealing with now is awkward consequences of this change for existing installs, where we'd probably want to *keep* modular repos, especially if any modules are actually enabled. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://email@example.com