I'm late to the party, but there are factual errors here that deserve
correcting.
On 7/4/20 10:23 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
Le vendredi 03 juillet 2020 à 11:09 -0700, PGNet Dev a écrit :
%define _build_timestamp %( date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S )
You’re hitting rpm macro expansion and the fact someone added %S as
alias to%SOURCE in recent rpm versions (source management is an unholly
mess in original rpm and people keep bolting new workarounds over old
workarounds insteak of fixing it once and for all.
Sorry but that's just not true at all, %S being a macro dates back to
rpm 3.x days, ditto for %P.
Implementation details of built-in macros changed in recent rpm which
causes different behavior.
The original lua integration in rpm was justified by the needs of the
%sources macro, that’s not an accident).
The real reason for Lua integration was to have something to run
%pretrans with. %sources and all that is a much, much later addition.
Deity knows there's lot of misinformation around rpm, please don't make
up more.
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
