On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:33 PM kevin <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Do you think it would be a good idea to file bugs for those packages > > where a build for f33 was "forgotten"? > > Since I already have the "downgrade check" scripted [0] it's a simple task > > of: > > > > - check if the package has attempted build for f33 > > - if yes, check if it's FTBFS, and don't report a bug > > - if no build was attempted for f33, report a bug > > > > I see ~100 downgraded *binary* packages going from fully updated f32 > > to fully updated f33. > > The number of affected *source* packages is naturally lower than that. > > The script also doesn't account for packages being renamed (but in > > those cases, proper Obsoletes and Provides need to be present during > > package review, so I don't think this is a problem). > > Yes, I think that would be lovely. > > kevin
I'm on it. By the way, I'm finding some weird issues where packages are tagged with f33 in koji for a few days but an *older* build is in the repos, e.g. appliance-tools and ddgr. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
