On Sun, 2020-09-13 at 16:47 +0000, Alexey Avramov wrote: > > So with > > applications started, you might get higher. > > I think we should protect only basic GUI. On computers with 16G+ RAM > locking 1G memory with apps should not be a problem if it helps to > improve responsiveness.
Yup, fully agree. We only need to make sure the user remains in control, we don't need to save random apps. > > Was that with or without swap? > > It was without swap, but with swap it has the same effect (faster > killer coming and system reclaiming) + responsiveness was improved > during heavy swapping. Yeah. I think things may be different for GNOME with JIT'ed code potentially getting swapped out. > > I feel that uresourced is just nicer conceptually. > > So uresourced is > > going to be ineffective for KDE for the time being. > > However, the advantage of prelockd is that may be used on old systems > with any DE and any file system and an init. On Debian 9 Mate locking > 150-200M takes very good effect. On Fedora with LXDE 200M is also > good value. Entirely true. I just personally prefer aiming for the long term here. Benjamin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
