On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 19:07, Steven A. Falco <stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm getting a build failure [1] in F32 that I'm not seeing in other targets 
> (F31, F33, rawhide are all good).
>
> The error is in the tex packages:
>
> ERROR: 
> Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/2028/54442028/local/work/tasks/1779/54441779/kicad-5.1.8-1.fc32.src.rpm)
>  Config(f32-build-23694835-2326598) 0 minutes 58 seconds
> INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/f32-build-23694835-2326598/result
> ERROR: Command failed:
>   # /usr/bin/dnf builddep --installroot 
> /var/lib/mock/f32-build-23694835-2326598/root/ --setopt=install_weak_deps=0 
> --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk 
> /var/lib/mock/f32-build-23694835-2326598/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/kicad-5.1.8-1.fc32.src.rpm
>  --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
> No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Wed Oct 28 22:59:10 2020.
> Error:
>   Problem: package texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-16.fc32.x86_64 requires 
> texlive-texlive-scripts = 7:20200327-16.fc32, but none of the providers can 
> be installed
>    - package texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch requires 
> /usr/bin/texlua, but none of the providers can be installed
>    - package po4a-0.60-1.fc32.noarch requires texlive-kpathsea-bin, but none 
> of the providers can be installed
>    - package po4a-0.60-1.fc32.noarch requires texlive-kpathsea, but none of 
> the providers can be installed
>    - package texlive-luatex-7:20200327-16.fc32.x86_64 requires texlive-cm, 
> but none of the providers can be installed
>    - conflicting requests
>    - nothing provides tex-tetex needed by texlive-cm-9:svn49028-21.fc32.noarch
>    - nothing provides texlive-tetex-bin needed by 
> texlive-cm-9:svn49028-21.fc32.noarch
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> I'll wait a bit before resubmitting the job, but I'd appreciate suggestions 
> if there is something I can do to work around it.
>

It's not just you:
$ mock -r fedora-32-x86_64 --enablerepo=local --install texlive-tetex-bin
...
 Error: Transaction test error:
  file /etc/texlive/web2c/updmap.cfg conflicts between attempted
installs of texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch
  file /usr/share/man/man1/fmtutil.1.gz conflicts between attempted
installs of texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch
  file /usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz conflicts between attempted
installs of texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch
  file /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/texlive/fmtutil-user.sh
conflicts between attempted installs of
texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch
  file /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/texlive/fmtutil.pl
conflicts between attempted installs of
texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch
  file /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/texlive/updmap-user.sh
conflicts between attempted installs of
texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch
  file /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/texlive/updmap.pl
conflicts between attempted installs of
texlive-texlive-scripts-7:20200327-16.fc32.noarch and
texlive-tetex-7:20190410-12.fc32.noarch

I think this is due to this buildroot override (maintainer cc'd):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/texlive-base-20200327-16.fc32
Something lower-level like this should probably use a side tag.

> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54441778
>
>         Steve
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to