On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:44:05AM -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > On 11/23/20 10:30 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > > > > > Den lör 21 nov. 2020 kl 15:31 skrev James Szinger <jszin...@gmail.com > > <mailto:jszin...@gmail.com>>: > > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:35:19 -0600 > > Brandon Nielsen <niels...@jetfuse.net <mailto:niels...@jetfuse.net>> > > wrote: > > > If it has changed, it would be really great if pipewire-pulse could > > > make it into the F33 repos so it could be easily tested. > > > > I agree. I think new software should be available and testable on a > > stable Fedora release before it becomes default. I’m not ready to > > have a rawhide install on real hardware to test something that’s not > > ready yet. I am especially wary of a change that requires new > > software to be written between now and beta. > > > > > > > > I think this is a way too high burden on new features. Testing in > > rawhide should be enough. Something like pipewire is also pretty easy to > > test in a Live system. > > > > [Snip] > > > > Easy to test basic things like sound works, headphones work, output device > changing works. Much more difficult to test every audio use-case I use in a > given day, week, month, because needs and uses change so much. Am I using my > Bluetooth headphones today? A USB audio interface? Webcam? HDMI? Plus I work > across different systems with almost entirely different hardware. I may be > willing to run Rawhide on some of these systems, but most people probably > won't. > > I'm not saying this should necessarily be a mandate. But for something > completely fundamental to how a lot of people use their systems, especially > now, with such a wide array of hardware and uses, we should absolutely be > pursuing the widest possible test coverage. And right now, the only answers > are "it works in rawhide" and "it will be feature complete later".
Please do note that this week has US holidays in it and change owners may be off away from computers taking time off. I don't think we should be impatient on this... let them get a chance to respond rather than everyone saying over and over they don't think it's ready and it's not testable yet. Additionally, since it's a big change with a wide amount of workflows and hardware and users expected, thats another reason to accept the change for f34. It will then get testing up until the beta freeze... if it's not ready then, it can be moved to f35 all the better for all the testing it got in the early f34 cycle. So, IMHO, relax, wait for change owners to make things testable, then test and file bugs and we can see where we are. There's too many unknowns right at this minute. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
