On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 7:39 PM Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply. > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:25 AM Mikolaj Izdebski <mizde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > This warning is relevant for upstream projects, but you can safely > > ignore it when building RPM packages with XMvn - it always uses > > packaged versions of Maven plugins, ignoring versions configured in > > POM. > > That's good to know. Thank you for the information. > > > IMHO (1), (3), (2), in that order of preference. > > (3) is the most elegant solution, but requires maintaining one more > > package than (1), which also works. (2) doesn't make much sense - it > > would only silence the warning at the cost of cluttering the spec > > file, making it harder to maintain. > > I have gone with (1) as you suggested. > > > It's hard to say without looking at the POM structure. I can check if > > you give me a reference to the code (upstream, SRPM etc). > > Fabio figured out that it's because all of the module references are > inside profiles. > > I'm still willing to swap reviews for whoever has time for this. > Fabio suggested a slight name change, which I adopted: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898312 (jakarta-json)
I'll look at the package, but I cannot promise to get the review done before tomorrow. :) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
