On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:59:50PM +0100, David Kaufmann wrote: > Count me in, but honestly I don't see a lot of things that need to be > changed - I'm quite happy with how it behaves. But aside that I'm happy > to help with those issues that come up.
That would be amazing! In order for it to remain as an edition, we (speaking generally for the Council) like to see regular meetings -- at least monthly. There are two open issues in the tracker at https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issues, and even if it's not ever a flood of things just making sure they're looked at helps keep things going. That plus status updates on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/dashboard/ regularly. And of course people showing up to help with issues at release time. One outstanding thing that could be worked on is the merger of the Fedora Cloud Base image and Fedora Server. We agreed that this should be done several Flocks ago, but no one has had time to actually make it happen. There was also talk of working more closely with Ansible on system roles. I'd love to see that revived too! There is also potential for greater collaboration with CentOS and the CentOS Stream project. I'd love to have a clear, non-competitive answer for each of these projects on when one should use what. And, of course, there's helping develop marketing materials for Mindshare groups to use to help the Edition grow more users. But none of these latter things are _necessary_. It's really the first thing of just reviving the cadence of meetings and status updates. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
