On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 12:24:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > > > > > > > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > > > > > > > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the > > > > > > default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will > > > > > > be > > > > > > manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set > > > > > > to > > > > > > use "main". > > > > > > > > > > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on > > > > > src.fp.o? > > > > > For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are > > > > > changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for > > > > > dist-git repos. > > > > > > > > One of the argument was that not every namespace on dist-git has a > > > > rawhide > > > > version, for example containers do not have/use rawhide. > > > > And having different default branches on different namespaces is not > > > > very > > > > appealing. > > > > > > I second the request to use "rawhide" for rawhide branches. > > > > > > The way that branches in dist-git are used is very different from how > > > branches are used in the usual git repo, so I find the argument that > > > the same rules as in other repos should be used convincing. If we rename > > > > Not convincing? :) > > Yeah, sorry. That sentence was clearly too long. > > > > it to rawhide, we have the simple rule that "branch of a given name is > > > used to build for that Fedora release", without any further explanation > > > about one exception necessary. > > > > Thats nice I guess, but it's still going to be more confusing for new > > users that would expect a main branch (after more things move to that > > around the world). > > > > I suppose we could split the difference and make main a ref to rawhide > > or vice versa? > > That'd work for me. >
I've filed an RFE for supporting this use-case: https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/5061 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
